http://www.nochubbyhubby.com/mens-health-magazines-what-is-the-cutoff-year-for-outdated-information/ rebuilding for a better tomorrow Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:24:09 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://www.nochubbyhubby.com/mens-health-magazines-what-is-the-cutoff-year-for-outdated-information/comment-page-1/#comment-11574 dr.frend Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:16:27 +0000 http://www.nochubbyhubby.com/?p=5304#comment-11574 hey, these books still good for u. u r common men na hey, these books still good for u. u r common men na

]]> http://www.nochubbyhubby.com/mens-health-magazines-what-is-the-cutoff-year-for-outdated-information/comment-page-1/#comment-11573 kaz Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:14:44 +0000 http://www.nochubbyhubby.com/?p=5304#comment-11573 Science is not like technology in that it's still good after 6 months. The only time old information should be viewed as incorrect is when newer information is presented contradicting it. It's best to also have some analysis as to why the new should be accepted over the old as well. Health information form '01/'02 is mostly still valid- not a lot of major stuff happens in such an old study (health and nutrition have been studied since long before Greece's day). And the new stuff is mostly insignificant to 'normal' individuals. The FDA's website is a good resource for food and nutrition information, and has good links as well. Science is not like technology in that it’s still good after 6 months. The only time old information should be viewed as incorrect is when newer information is presented contradicting it. It’s best to also have some analysis as to why the new should be accepted over the old as well. Health information form ‘01/’02 is mostly still valid- not a lot of major stuff happens in such an old study (health and nutrition have been studied since long before Greece’s day). And the new stuff is mostly insignificant to ‘normal’ individuals. The FDA’s website is a good resource for food and nutrition information, and has good links as well.

]]>